When I hear of a case like this one where a jury dismisses most of the charges and a judge dismisses testimony, I have to wonder if a teacher accused of sexually molesting kids is innocent.
After three days of deliberation, a Syracuse, New York jury acquitted teacher, Albert Scerbo, 45, on 17 of the 19 charges that he molested seven and eight-year-old Native American girls in his class at Onondaga Nation School. The judge dismissed the charges pertaining to seven of the 17 girls because they had changed their accounts or said they had lied to police.
Racial tensions in the classroom also make me wonder about this case. According to the testimony, a fifth-grade girl called Scerbo a “white Christian cracker” the day before she told the school nurse that he touched her and other girls inappropriately. Was her outburst caused by anger over the molestation or was she acting out over race?
The facts are that Scerbo would let the girls sit on his lap in the darkened classroom while they watched movies. He admits this was stupid. I agree. So when one girl testified that Scerbo would put his hands on her stomach then touch her private parts, and that made her mad, well it sounded pretty truthful to me.
As Chief Gibson of the Onondaga Indian Nation told the media, two convictions out of 19 will take Scerbo away from teaching and being around kids. And if he molested one girl why not three, five or 17?
Innocent or guilty? What do you think?
Albert Scerbo, sexual molestation, sexual abuse, Onondaga Nation School